皇冠足球app(www.hg108.vip):High Court rules Rewcastle-Brown's bid to challenge defamation charge premature

admin 2个月前 (08-15) 体育 8 1

telegram群发软件破解版www.tel8.vip)是一个Telegram群组分享平台。telegram群发软件破解版包括telegram群发软件破解版、telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组(其他)、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容。telegram群发软件破解版为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。

High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan says Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown's application to refer two questions of law to the Federal Court will only be considered if her case is transferred to the High Court. - The Malaysian Insight file pic, August 12, 2022.

THE High Court today ruled that it was premature to refer to the Federal Court to determine the constitutionality of a criminal defamation charge framed against Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown.

As such, judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan said, he decided not to consider the merit of Rewcastle-Brown’s application to refer two questions of law to the Federal Court.

He said Rewcastle-Brown’s application to transfer her case from the Kuala Terengganu Magistrate’s Court to the Kuala Lumpur High Court had to be heard and disposed of first.

Rewcastle-Brown could make the application to refer the two questions of law, if her case was transferred to the High Court, he said, adding that the court had not decided whether to allow her application to transfer the case. 

,

皇冠足球appwww.hg108.vip)是一个开放皇冠即时比分、代理最新登录线路、会员最新登录线路、皇冠代理APP下载、皇冠会员APP下载、皇冠线路APP下载、皇冠电脑版下载、皇冠手机版下载的皇冠新现金网平台。皇冠官网平台上登录线路最新、新2皇冠网址更新最快,皇冠体育APP开放皇冠会员注册、皇冠代理开户等业务。

,

“In layman’s terms, the applicant’s application is still in transit. I am of the opinion that Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 would only apply if the proceedings concerned had been registered in the High Court,” he said

In September last year, Rewcastle-Brown was charged with criminal defamation at a Kuala Terengganu Magistrate’s Court over the publication of a book, The Sarawak Report: The Inside Story of the 1MDB Exposé.

She then applied to transfer the case from the Kuala Terengganu Magistrates Court to the Kuala Lumpur High Court, which was set for hearing on March 29, 2022.

However, the High Court fixed December 12 to hear the transfer application pending the hearing of Rewcastle-Brown’s request to refer the two questions of law to the Federal Court.

On Nov 21, 2018, Terengganu’s Sultanah Nur Zahirah filed a suit, naming Rewcastle-Brown, Gerakbudaya Enterprise publisher Chong Ton Sin and printing company Vinlin Press Sdn Bhd, as the first to third defendants, alleging that the first defendant made a disparaging statement about her in the book. – Bernama, August 12, 2022.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。
Sunbet声明:该文看法仅代表作者自己,与本平台无关。转载请注明:皇冠足球app(www.hg108.vip):High Court rules Rewcastle-Brown's bid to challenge defamation charge premature

网友评论

  • (*)

最新评论

  • 欢迎进入欧博亚洲客户端(Allbet Game):www.aLLbetgame.us,“欧博官网是欧博集”团的官方网站。<欧博官网开放>Allbet注册、Allbe【代理】、Allbet『电脑客户端』、Allbet<手机版下载等业务>。偶然看到的,一直在看

    1

文章归档

    站点信息

    • 文章总数:8666
    • 页面总数:0
    • 分类总数:8
    • 标签总数:2311
    • 评论总数:5979
    • 浏览总数:635923